Monday, 27 October 2025

College leaders are right to stand up for students and the taxpayer

To The Editor,

COLLEGE leaders are to be applauded for taking a tough stance against college lecturers who take part in another marking boycott ("Colleges agree plan to dock pay from staff who take part in marking boycott", The Herald, February 10). It's about time somebody in this country stood up to out-of-control trade unions.

Following their long summer holiday last year, FE lecturers mounted a similar resulting boycott. They did so because they were dissatisfied with the arrangement which sees the taxpayer fund them to have 13 weeks' holiday per year. They were further dissatisfied that they earn only £40,000 compared to Scotland's median gross annual salary for full-time workers, which is £33,332. And they were even further dissatisfied with their chalk-face workload of 20-odd hours per week. They were dissatisfied then, and they're dissatisfied still. I've come to the conclusion that they will never be satisfied, and that they will always come back for more.

The consequence of last year's resulting boycott by well-salaried, superannuated lecturers was that young people's lives were put on hold because they couldn't complete their apprenticeships. The boycott similarly stopped first-year construction apprentices, who barely earn £6 per hour, from progressing to their next stage and receiving a £2p/h wage rise for which they'd worked all year. Everything and everyone was to wait until the lecturers got more. In the topsy-turvy world of progressive politics it's Mr Bumble who demands more from Oliver. What is in the interests of apprentices, their families and their employers was simply a means to the lecturers' end. And the end is, more. More, more, more. And when they get it, they still want more.

Now they want to do the same thing again. So it's right that college leaders stand up for the taxpayer as well as their students. But perhaps more radical solutions need to be considered. Perhaps the argument for the development of technical schools could simply do away with the need for a college sector altogether. Perhaps the taxpayer could do more with less.

Yours sincerely, 

...


https://www.heraldscotland.com/opinion/24115159.college-leaders-right-stand-students-taxpayer/


Thursday, 9 October 2025

The University Myth is Crumbling: Why the American Public is Pushing Trade School.

The myth that getting to university is the apogee of school is crumbling. Across the Atlantic, Americans are realizing that their country won't be made great again by a surfeit of university students.


A young man I spoke to recently—successful, full-time employed, and genuinely happy with his career—made a simple, fascinating statement: 'I'm glad I didn't go to university'.

He wasn't proud or defiant; he was simply content and deeply satisfied with the tangible, skilled work he does. He loves his job, he is good at it, and he holds a quiet confidence that comes from being a competent individual providing a valuable service to our community. For a generation that was relentlessly told a degree was the only ticket to success, his casual confidence felt monumental.

It turns out his personal choice is part of a massive, trans-Atlantic movement. The data shows that the wider public is finally pushing back against the outdated four-year degree machine.

In the U.S., a Workforce Monitor survey from the American Staffing Association found a shocking inversion of advice: 33% of adults would advise graduating high school seniors to attend a vocational or trade school, compared to just 28% who would encourage them to attend a four-year university.

The reasons for this shift are twofold: what I'm calling on one hand "the negative push" and on the other hand, "the positive pull".

The Negative Push is the disillusionment with the academic path as reported this week in Fortune magazine:

 * An astounding 62% of white-collar workers would happily switch to trade jobs for better stability and pay.
 * 55% of workers felt that their training programmes or university degrees didn’t actually prepare them for their roles.

That’s the core problem with the university myth: it's failing to deliver on the promise of career relevance.

But the real story is the Positive Pull—the draw toward working with your hands. These careers offer a constant sense of physical and personal accomplishment. Whether you’re fixing an engine, wiring a house, or laying perfect pipework, the completion of the job is a self-evident success. It's the satisfaction of a job well done and the personal fulfilment that comes from seeing and touching the tangible results of your skill.

Richard Wahlquist, CEO at ASA, summed up the need for change: 

"Americans are clearly concerned that colleges and universities are failing to equip students with the workplace-relevant skills that employers need." 

Even the US Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell recognises the skills gap.


The message is clear: parents, educators, and policymakers need to stop clinging to outdated notions of success and start supporting paths designed for real competence, stability, and the genuine satisfaction of the 'jobs of today and the future world of work".


Sources

One in Three Americans Recommend Trade School Over College for High School Grads, American Staffing Association,  5th June 2025, https://americanstaffing.net/posts/2025/06/05/trade-school-over-college/
(retrieved 2nd October 2025)

Eleanor Pringle, 'The blue-collar revolution isn’t just for Gen Z. Six in 10 white-collar professionals say they’d switch for the right trades job', Fortune (30th September 2025), https://fortune.com/2025/09/30/white-collar-work-gen-z-blue-collar-revolution-career-change-flexjobs/, 
(retrieved 2nd October 2025)


Image Credits

Crumbling brick pillars of the corridor at Mission San Antonio de Padua, California, ca.1906 (CHS-4378), picryl.com, http://digitallibrary.usc.edu, public domain, (retrieved 2nd October 2025)

Mason at Work, Stockcake.com, Public Domain, https://stockcake.com/i/mason-at-work_832285_1089245, (retrieved 2nd October 2025)

Friday, 19 September 2025

L'appel du vide: Electricians and Paratroopers

High Places Phenomenon (HPP), or more commonly, "l'appel du vide," (the call of the void) is the sudden, inexplicable urge to jump from a high place, even when you have no intention of harming yourself.



I've never heard that call: never felt that urge. But my wife has. She isn't scared of heights. She'll happily climb to the top of an enclosed rooftop terrace. 

But without that balustrade, she'd surely have felt the urge to sprint towards the edge and hurl herself off. She does not however, unless you're inclined towards Freudian psychology, have a secret death wish. It is more commonly understood that l'appel du vide is a cognitive glitch; a misreading of the self-preserving signal to back away from the edge. A bit like misreading the red stop light as a signal to go. Perhaps, not unsurprisingly, it's experienced as an unpleasant feeling of uncanniness. A feeling better avoided than overcome. 

From Heights to Hazards: Expanding the Concept


Callum Robinson, in ‘A Brief Note On: Health and Safety’ in his excellent book Ingrained, feels the urge from the top of a tree: the urge to. He gets it. That uncanny urge. But Robinson, a furniture maker and a wood worker, takes it a step further, imagining himself impulsively sprinting towards a bandsaw and then leaping to meet the blade head first.

He once made the mistake of assuming it was a universal feeling asking a colleague if they'd ever considered running into a cutting machine. Robinson conveys the awkward silence that follows so well that the reader feels the uncanniness of it all.

Andrew Klavan tells the story of a Romantic poet's fascination with electricity. At the the beginning of the nineteenth century, long before the invention of the Regs Book, the poet Percy Shelley would while away his college days at Oxford by collecting pieces of electrical equipment. He was fascinated by the subject. His friend T.J. Hogg would help him attach wires to his hands and body, and then shock him until 'his long, wild locks bristled and stood on end'.

Like Shelley, I wanted to know what an electric shock felt like. I imagine most, if not all first year apprentice electricians, wonder what it feels like. An old lecturer advised me that there were only two possible outcomes: you'll either still be alive, or you won't. A nice, straightforward binary outcome. After I found out, I stopped wondering. I've never felt the urge to put my hands on three-phase busbars out of curiosity. It's not fear; it's just respect for the amoral phenomenon of electricity.  Perhaps it was this amorality that appealed to Shelley.


Robinson's piece prompted some questions about accidents in the workplace. Was it possible, I wondered, whether those individuals who hear l'appel du vide were more likely to have accidents because they inadvertently listened too closely to the call? Think of that French verb, S'appeler, to name oneself. Are accidents an identification with the void, as if the void knows your name?

Etymologically inaccurate as that reading is, it's possibly also the wrong way around. What if sufferers of l'appel du vide aren't more prone to throwing themselves from high places but less likely to do so precisely because they're experiencing an urge without an attendant desire? Someone who experiences l'appel du vide is actually receiving a very strong safety alert from their brain. They are keenly aware of the danger. The feeling is unsettling, but it serves as a powerful reminder of the "void" and the need for caution.

What if it's people like me, people who don't get it, who are oblivious to the danger who are more likely to injure themselves? Someone who doesn't experience the call might lack this specific, visceral safety alert and therefore might not have the same immediate, physical sense of danger that the "call" provides. This could make me more susceptible to accidents because I might not fully register the presence of the void and the risks associated with it. The silence leading to a false sense of security.

But it's not just Robinson fils. Robinson père too. He even has a name for it: "Machine Tool Vertigo". And with just that word it's impossible not to have Bernard Hermann’s chords sound in your head. And although l'appel du vide isn't acrophobia it's equally impossible not to picture James Stewart on the very edge of the mission's bell tower.

P Company

"P Company," is a gruelling 5-day selection course for the British Army's Parachute Regiment. It's a physically and mentally demanding test designed to identify individuals with the required grit and resilience to become airborne warriors. Passing 'P Company' earns you the right to wear the red beret. As a case study, it helps illuminate some possible answers to those questions.


The Trainasium, a core component of P Company selection, is an elevated assault course set at 30 to 60 feet above the ground. The most challenging part, the "shuffle bars", involves walking across two parallel scaffolding poles. This scenario is a deliberate test of a soldier's ability to function under the physiological and psychological stress that this height and lack of a protective barrier creates.

The shuffle bars are actually not that high off the upper platform. But because the whole trainasium structure takes you above the treetops, standing on the bars is designed to make it feel a great deal higher than it is. It's a clever psychological trick: make the candidate feel fear without putting them in any real danger. 

One other feature of the shuffle bars which makes them scarier than they actually are, is the absence of any barriers. One could, you're made to feel, fall a great distance. But P Company isn't designed to identify people who aren't scared. Instead its designed to identify those recruits who can still perform effectively under fear's influence. Not to not hear the call of the void, but to hear it, and still do your duty.

Physical and Metaphysical Barriers: The Urge Without a Desire

When my wife and I climbed out onto the roof terrace of The Music Room, the balustrade acted as a physical barrier. To answer the call she'd have to do something more than just run and jump . She would have to climb over the barrier and that's not what l'appel du vide prompts. 

But more significantly, she didn't hear l'appel du vide. That was odd to learn. At a tautologically obvious level, physical barriers act as physical barriers but they also act as a sound barrier blocking off, or silencing, the call of the void. And so, on another level, since there is no objective call to hear, they also act as a psychological barrier. There was no immediate sense of danger and therefore no signal to misread.


Conclusion

Barriers in a distribution board are crucial for safety. They are designed to enclose or shield live parts, providing a physical barrier that primarily prevents accidental contact with live electrical parts. These barriers typically offer at least IPXXB or IP2X protection, meaning they prevent access by small objects like fingers.

But, remember, next time you fit one: it's not just a physical barrier; you're silencing l'appel du vide.

Sources & Credits



Robinson, C. (2024) Ingrained: The Making of a Craftsman, London, Penguin

The Institute of Engineering and Technology, (2022) BS 7671 2018 + A2, Requirements for Electrical Installations, Eighteenth Edition, London, IET

Klavan, A. (2022) The Truth and Beauty: How the Lives and Works of England's Greatest Poet's Point the Way to a Deeper Understanding of the Words of Jesus, Michigan, Zondervan Books, (quoted from pp.72-73)

Image Credits

Bruce Robinson in The Pirn Inn as part of Balfron Book Festival, 6th September 2025. Photo taken by Donna Nicholson-Arnott

A Rooftop Terrace With A View, (2nd August 2025) taken at the Landmark Trust's Music Room in Lancaster. Photo taken by Donna Nicholson-Arnott

Trainasium, The Parachute Regiment Training Company, (17 April 2019), X, https://x.com/Para_Training/status/1118585166467932161, (retrieved 19th September 2025)

File:Shelley Memorial, University College, Oxford (5178754841).jpg, Wikimedia Commons, https://share.google/cOQU4iUTDhwstb3aJ, CC 2.0, (retrieved 19th September 2025)

College leaders are right to stand up for students and the taxpayer

To The Editor, COLLEGE leaders are to be applauded for taking a tough stance against college lecturers who take part in another ...